On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:52:52 PM UTC-7, TreKing wrote: > > > That said ... so you're saying that any user that wants those new features > and already supported you by buying the original app has to pay again and > have a secondary app installed? That, sir, is a *dick move* (pardon my > French) and will likely earn your current app quite a backlash. > > That said, I, for one, wouldn't think of you as a bad person if you did decide to do it that way. Or the way that Trekking suggests. Or a different way of your choosing.
It's a business decision. It has to be worthwhile for you. Just because people feel entitled to updates and great new features throughout eternity because they paid a few bucks two years ago doesn't mean that they are. That attitude is somewhat unique to the app world. Try going to a car dealership and tell them to install a dvd player and leather seats in the car you bought two years ago because it comes standard in this year's car. You just need to decide how you are positioning this. If you decide the app as it is today still has evergreen value, but that the new, enhanced app serves a more demanding market who are willing to pay more, that would be a reason to have a separate app. You could decide that the new features are a valuable addon, that a number of people will want and be willing to pay more for. That would be a reason to have it as an inapp purchase. You could decide, in an act of self serving benevolence, to make the present app free to run up its usage, giving you a greater pool of people to sell the new shiny version to. You could, as Treking suggests, decide that your product is maturing, and what people have paid for the first two years was an "introductory" price, then raise the price as the new features come in. No path will be without its detractors. You may get hate mail for raising the price of an existing product, but if they aren't willing to pay the new price, that keeps their comments off the new version. There could be some backlash on the old version's ratings if the new version is available at a price., but the new version will benefit from having the most grateful and least whiny users, so its rating will likely benefit. Make your old version free, and some people could be mad that they paid for it before that. Some will object to paying an in app purchase fee for new features. But at the end of the day, do what makes you the most money that you can still feel good about. I'm not saying I've set a good example. I've given my users a lot for free over the last three years. But I have solid data to suggest that I'll be out of business if I do that for everything. That wouldn't serve users in the end much either. Nathan -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
