I agree.  However I find it very rich that Google is telling me what I can
and cannot do when they are doing exactly the same.  As said before I am
very happy to remove offending applications (given the opportunity).

On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Kristopher Micinski <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Google isn't peddling stolen goods, it's providing a link to stolen
> goods.  However, you should note that Google frequently *does* take
> down images when they get complaints.  And many of the images you see
> linked *are* in violation of copyright.
>
> If you sold and made money off of them, you should consider yourself
> lucky you didn't get sued (while this sounds like it would never
> happen to a small developer, consider the hundreds of developers who
> are now getting Lodsys letters) and create a new account.  I'm sure
> that if you fought hard enough, removed all apps in violation, and
> started over, you could probably get your account reinstated.  However
> I feel like the work it would take for this to happen just wouldn't be
> worth the time you'd have to put into it..
>
> Also, asking for legal advice on a public list isn't all that
> productive, even if you know the law exactly (and in this case, I'm
> certain you violated some DMCA copyright laws, the fact that google
> links to copyrighted images is no excuse, you can't steal a car just
> because Google stole mine last week), you'll still need a lawyer to
> take action on your behalf.
>
> And to be honest, hiring a lawyer is probably (for you) going to be
> much more expensive than just cutting your losses and starting over
> with a new account..
>
> Kris
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Simon Platten <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > If I type Marvel into google images and hit the search button I get lots
> of
> > images from various source.  The links it provides are not only the
> correct
> > / proper / originator site but also everyone else that has copied or used
> > it.  So Google is peddling stolen goods?
> >
> > Whatever spin you want to put on it, Google is displaying copied
> material, I
> > am not claiming to be the originator or owner of the material and will
> > gladly remove it given the opportunity, but I fail to see the difference.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Raghav Sood
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> In the image search, each image provides a clear link to where it
> >> originally turns up. Google is merely indexing them. It is not branding
> them
> >> as it's own images.
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Raghav Sood
> >> http://www.androidactivist.org/ - Author
> >> http://www.appaholics.in/ - Founder
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> Groups "Android Developers" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected]
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Android Developers" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Android Developers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to