IT’S BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They returned the account. And the applications. The app is only 4 positions back in the overall ranking (from 49 to 53). Just WOW! Didn’t expect them to react so fast. There is still no word from Google what was the problem.
I've removed the keywords. If this was the problem and if they ever contact me I'll ask them if I can at least keep the device models. I think it's important. I’m so excited :))))))))))) Later today I’ll release a new version which will have full support for LG Revolution and LG Optimus Black. Next week I’ll add support for Kyocera Echo (still waiting for the device to arrive). For the first birthday of the app (which is 8th of July) I’m preparing something big – v4.0, which will fully support tablets and landscape mode. Also all lights images will be dynamically loaded from internet (sorry, the cloud), which will give the user the ability to install and uninstall different lights. This will reduce the application size to a fraction of what it is today. So if you have a G1, which has very small internal storage you don’t have to download all lights and all types of images (for high resolution). Also you will be able to strip it to a single widget if you don’t need the other lights. I think this will be the first app of its kind. About Google – they just kept their most loyal developer And thanks to Phandroid.com and Rob. Without them the app would have been lost forever. On Jun 15, 9:11 am, "n.a" <devuni...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't know yet. I'm still waiting for more accurate data from > Flurry. > Most of the users are using the widget, so they never see any ads. > > In this article Quentyn says that the widget is still on his home > screen:http://phandroid.com/2011/06/14/tiny-flashlight-led-developer-banned-... > > On Jun 15, 9:02 am, Mark Carter <mjc1...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Were the apps remotely removed from your users' devices? If not, then once > > you have republished (as Zsolt suggested), you can use House Ads to drive > > your pulled-app customers to your republished apps. > > > On 15 June 2011 13:40, Zsolt Vasvari <zvasv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > What Google has to do is to create a separate Tags input field in the > > > > market admin panel, give it some limit and then let the developers > > > > compete. This is the fair way. > > > > In your case, 2/3 of your app description was keywords -- so you were > > > by far one of the worst violators. Perhaps one of your competitors > > > reported you for stealing from them and Google acted on it. I have no > > > idea. > > > > Is there anything stopping you from creating a new account, paying the > > > $25 again and republishing your app? It's not ideal, but since you > > > have a free app, it's not like you have to migrate the users. If your > > > app is good, and I believe it was, your rank would rise fairly quickly. > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups "Android Developers" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
