"You were saying something about buttons - how are you creating them,
and
mapping to the right data item? "

I set a tag to the cursor position in the bindView() function.

On Feb 8, 3:20 pm, Kostya Vasilyev <kmans...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, waiting on synchronized block or thread.wait blocks the waiting thread
> and only lets other threads run.
>
> But, that synchronization doesn't sound good for a different reason, since
> you are blocking the UI thread, and that should not happen.
>
> One way around it is to make that cached data item available in the query
> used to populate the list, and fire off update requests to the worker thread
> as needed. Once the worker thread updates the cached item, the list should
> update automatically (since you mentioned that your data is in a content
> provider).
>
> You were saying something about buttons - how are you creating them, and
> mapping to the right data item?
>
> --
> Kostya Vasilyev --http://kmansoft.wordpress.com
> 09.02.2011 1:04 пользователь "ivan" <istas...@gmail.com> написал:
>
> > The only manipulation to the view object is via the non-overridden
> > ResourseCursorAdapter bindView() function. On occasion this function
> > will block for a couple seconds maximum if a drm data cache is
> > occurring in another thread, but that thread never touches the view
> > object. Maybe waiting on a synchronized block of code (in the UI
> > thread) to get values from the multi-threaded cache causes the UI
> > thread to wait, releasing cycles to the UI thread, which in turn
> > allows the misplaced event to occur?
>
> > On Feb 8, 12:32 pm, Kostya Vasilyev <kmans...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Are you sure that you only touch the ListView and its adapter from the
> >> UI thread?
>
> >> -- Kostya
>
> >> 08.02.2011 22:11, ivan пишет:
>
> >> > Thanks for the reply.
>
> >> > The button events are -- nine times out of ten -- tied to the correct
> >> > data, but if you rapidly push a button you can throw an event that
> >> > will be tied to the wrong data.  I thought that this didn't make sense
> >> > since everything should be occurring on the UI thread (right?).  But
> >> > it appears that the event can sneak in before the screen is actually
> >> > refreshed.
>
> >> > On Feb 8, 11:24 am, Kostya Vasilyev<kmans...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >> >> If the button is linked to the wrong item, then you have a bug in your
> >> >> adapter's getView, where you're not properly associating the button
> with
> >> >> the item for the case where convertView != null.
>
> >> >> As for performance, I find it useful, when refreshing a ListView item
> in
> >> >> response to some event, to go through the visible list items, find the
> >> >> ones that are affected, and push new values into them right then and
> >> >> there, rather than calling notifyDataSetChanged / Invalidated.
>
> >> >> -- Kostya
>
> >> >> 08.02.2011 19:47, ivan пишет:
>
> >> >>> Anyone?
> >> >>> On Feb 7, 4:33 pm, ivan<istas...@gmail.com>    wrote:
> >> >>>> I'm using a ResourceCursorAdapter to display a list of downloads
> from
> >> >>>> a ContentProvider that track's my application's downloads -- modeled
> >> >>>> after Android's DownloadProvider.
> >> >>>> The problem is that when a download is actively running it
> frequently
> >> >>>> calls bind view--every few seconds--to update a download progress
> bar,
> >> >>>> with a view object that is NOT currently associated with a given
> >> >>>> cursor position.  Thus, bind view is constantly recycling and
> binding
> >> >>>> view objects to new item/cursor positions.
> >> >>>> This is especially a problem if the user attempts to push a button
> on
> >> >>>> one of the items while it's being bound to a different view object
> and
> >> >>>> cursor position, which results in an event being fired for the wrong
> >> >>>> data.
> >> >>>> Does anyone have advice on how to minimize unnecessary view
> recycling?
> >> >>>> It appears to only occur for the bottom and top list items (of the
> >> >>>> three on the screen), while the middle item remains tied to a single
> >> >>>> cursor and view object.
> >> >>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>> -Ivan
> >> >> --
> >> >> Kostya Vasilyev -- WiFi Manager + pretty widget --
>
> http://kmansoft.wordpress.com
>
> >> --
> >> Kostya Vasilyev -- WiFi Manager + pretty widget --
>
> http://kmansoft.wordpress.com
>
>
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Android Developers" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to