I'm not positive about this, but I think LVL actually does allow free apps, and it always return true (free apps are always licensed).
- Brill Pappin On 2011-01-06, at 12:26 PM, John Gaby <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting idea, but I do not believe that the Market will let you > publish a free app which asks for CHECK_LICENSE permissions, so I > don't think that your free app will not be allowed to use LVL. > > > On Jan 6, 7:41 am, Brill Pappin <[email protected]> wrote: >> No, you don't remove LVL so its still used to check the market. >> >> BTW - I'm not sure I completely agree with Zsolt on the modification. >> Fine to modify the library a little, but a non security/encryption expert is >> likely to make easy holes in such a library, particularly messing with >> the algorithms. >> The fact is that a determined cracker is going to get at your app no matter >> what you do. >> >> No, the idea is simply to use the LVL in the normal way, but communicate >> with the paid version in another way. >> Changes to LVL won't break it ether. >> >> - Brill Pappin > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Android Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
