Almost true; but even if it were true, that is not good enough. Sample code does not have to be finalize, robust, professional code, but since it IS the example the company is holding out as a good example of how to code something, it really should not be as bad as Lunar Lander is.
That is, there are certain things you can leave to the implementer of the professional version, and there are certain things that even the author of the sample code must get right: Lunar lander did not get the latter right. They really should either fix it or remove it -- it really is that bad! On Oct 22, 1:00 am, Doug <[email protected]> wrote: > I would have to say it contains no more errors per line of code than > the subject of your message. :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
