Yes, but Android will terminate this automatically isn't it?
On Aug 1, 1:38 am, a <andjar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> While I agree with most of the replies, there is one issue that makes task
> killers useful. Some apps run background tasks or they don't properly
> terminate threads when they should. These apps will drain ur battery and for
> this reason alone I use them.
>
>
>
> gcstang <gcst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >If it wasn't for a task killer my phone wouldn't last a day ....mine
> >as well be tethered to the wall.
>
> >On Jul 31, 1:31 am, Dianne Hackborn <hack...@android.com> wrote:
> >> You don't need task killers. Some people like them, and who I am I to
> >> argue
> >> with what people like? ;)
>
> >> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Mystique <joven.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > One question, not sure whether it is related.
> >> > Since Android manage task and application automatically and terminate
> >> > if necessary why do we need application like Advance Task Killer?
> >> > Isn't it redundant? I understand why Android was design this way, to
> >> > help speed up application and extra memory if not needed is just waste
> >> > so I rather have my app ready in the background and let Android decide
> >> > whether to close it.
>
> >> > Back to qns, why do we need ATK??? I have it install but I do not use
> >> > it anymore and doesn't seems to make a different.
>
> >> > On Jul 31, 6:38 am, Eric F <ericfrie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > Yeah this is exactly what I thought too. Just because non-technical
> >> > > people download task killers from the market doesn't mean that task
> >> > > killers are necessary. In my opinion it is way more likely that the
> >> > > explanation is that people are just very bad at shifting their way of
> >> > > thinking from paradigm to paradigm.
>
> >> > > And it also made me think of the windows tuner programs. I've noticed
> >> > > a trend in the way people think these days. I call it the do-nothing
> >> > > dilemma. We are incapable of doing nothing these days. What I mean is,
> >> > > when we look at a problem we instantly act for the "solution". Because
> >> > > we are so advanced these days that we are just used to things being
> >> > > already solved somewhere by someone, somehow. I am only 30, but I
> >> > > suspect that people living in the 1920s had more of a grin and bear it
> >> > > mentality ("man up") when it came to problems and hardship.
>
> >> > > Now, whether it's a kid hurting him/herself on a swing and people
> >> > > needing to "Do Something", banning swingsets from all playgrounds. Or
> >> > > a cellphone chugging along while syncing contacts, people don't think
> >> > > "huh, my cell phone is not as quick as I want it. Oh well I'll just
> >> > > deal, it's still a great phone and I'm sure in the future we'll have
> >> > > faster phones that don't slow down". They think "Wow, surely there
> >> > > must be someone to blame for this and someone with the fix. Oh here
> >> > > this task killer allows me to solve my problem". Soon they are
> >> > > probably having more problems than they started, but they don't care
> >> > > because now everytime they get disgruntled they can "do something"
> >> > > about it. And nobody wants to admit that they are administrating
> >> > > themselves placebos, so feeling like it *is* a valid solution is self
> >> > > reinforcing.
>
> >> > > That was a bit long winded. But I agree with Kostya, I don' think
> >> > > people downloading task killers from the marketplace show a deficiency
> >> > > in the OS. Only a deficiency in the way people adapt to new things.
>
> >> > > Obviously the pre-bundled apps that can't be uninstalled are a huge
> >> > > problem. task killers not really being a good solution there, the real
> >> > > solution is root -> uninstall. Hopefully Google will be able to nudge
> >> > > companies in the right direction. I doubt we'll ever be in a crapware
> >> > > free world, but perhaps they can be convinced to make crapware
> >> > > uninstallable.
>
> >> > > -E
>
> >> > > On Jul 30, 1:33 pm, Kostya Vasilyev <kmans...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > Technical details aside, I think it's just human nature.
>
> >> > > > Some percentage of users just have a strong desire to have something
> >> > > > "magical" that *supposedly* makes their device (Android phone or
> >> > desktop
> >> > > > OS) work much better.
>
> >> > > > Remember - there used to be all kinds of memory optimizers for
> >> > > > Windows?
> >> > > > Also registry cleaners, various "tweak" and "tune-up" utilities, etc.
> >> > > > etc. etc. No-one is saying that Windows (or any other OS :) is
> >> > > > perfect,
> >> > > > but these apps promise much more than they actually do, and sometimes
> >> > > > cause harm.
>
> >> > > > There is also a whole subculture of users who root and flash their
> >> > > > phones - I am convinced most do it because it addresses some
> >> > > > psychological need, more than anything else.
>
> >> > > > So personally, I am quite happy to see that Google is starting to
> >> > > > limit
> >> > > > what task killers can do. I believe interfering with the platform's
> >> > core
> >> > > > functionality is definitely a bad thing.
>
> >> > > > I have enough bugs in my code to have to deal with someone else's.
>
> >> > > > -- Kostya
>
> >> > > > 31.07.2010 0:08, Indicator Veritatis пишет:
>
> >> > > > > A good article. A little harsh on the OP, but even so, a good
> >> > article.
>
> >> > > > > After all: given that that IS the design of Android, that
> >> > Applications
> >> > > > > should not quit, but leave termination up to the OS, the article
> >> > makes
> >> > > > > its case well, even elegantly.
>
> >> > > > > But I cannot help but notice: after Android did all that hard work
> >> > > > > of
> >> > > > > designing the whole system to work that way, what does the market
> >> > > > > say
> >> > > > > about it? The presence of so many "Task Managers" for Android seems
> >> > to
> >> > > > > imply that the Market does NOT agree with this paradigm.
>
> >> > > > > Nor would that conclusion really surprise me, since it is a basic
> >> > > > > expectation, almost an instinct, even predating computers: if it
> >> > > > > doesn't work, you want to hit Reset, or power-cycle the device, and
> >> > > > > you expect that it will be in a known good state (note the
> >> > terminology
> >> > > > > reminiscent of s certain OS with its "last known good"). Exiting an
> >> > > > > application is the software-analog of shutting the power off: you
> >> > > > > expect that the next time you enter, you get a clean slate.
>
> >> > > > > True, WebOS doesn't work that way either, and Android's way is a
> >> > > > > new
> >> > > > > trend. But I don't see the market approving this in WebOS either --
> >> > > > > even if it does like it better than Palm's previous OS, Palm OS.
> >> > > > > For
> >> > > > > Palm OS was ugly.
>
> >> > > > > Besides: despite all the claims otherwise ("just let the system do
> >> > > > > it"), I _have_ come across circumstances when I really do want to
> >> > just
> >> > > > > exit everything to get the phone to behave again. Surely I am not
> >> > > > > alone, which is why people download the Task Managers for Android.
>
> >> > > > > On Jul 30, 10:39 am, Mark Murphy<mmur...@commonsware.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > >> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:13 AM,
> >> > > > >> RamaMohan<rama.mohan...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> > > > >>> HI all,
> >> > > > >>> I s there any way to kill the entire application at once.Not
> >> > > > >>> using
> >> > > > >>> with finish() or system.exit() ..all these two will kill the
> >> > > > >>> activity ,but not the appication.
> >> > > > >>> Is there any way to kill the entire application from any
> >> > > > >>> activity .
>
> >> >http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2033914/quitting-an-application-is...
>
> >> > > > >> --
> >> > > > >> Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy)http://commonsware.com|
> >> >http://github.com/commonsguyhttp://commonsware.com/blog|http://twitter.com/commonsguy
>
> >> > > > >> _Android Programming Tutorials_ Version 2.9 Available!
>
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Kostya Vasilev -- WiFi Manager + pretty widget --
> >> >http://kmansoft.wordpress.com
>
> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> > Groups "Android Developers" group.
> >> > To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<android-developers%2Bunsubs
> >> > cr...@googlegroups.com>
> >> > For more options, visit this group at
> >> >http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
>
> >> --
> >> Dianne Hackborn
> >> Android framework engineer
> >> hack...@android.com
>
> >> Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to
> >> provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such
> >> questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and
> >> answer them.
>
> >--
> >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >Groups "Android Developers" group.
> >To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
> >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> >For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
