Well, the IBM manuals could be pretty dry, but there were several that
were excellent.  The "Nutshell" books generally do a good job of
balancing tutorial and reference info, though the references are
necessarily abbreviated.

As an example of a pretty good (though far from perfect) online
reference, see the Qt documentation:
http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.6-snapshot/index.html

(I could also, of course, point you at some pretty abysmal online
documentation, such as the Symbian C++ stuff.)

On Jul 16, 1:06 pm, "Maps.Huge.Info (Maps API Guru)"
<cor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Pardon my direct contact...
>
> Back in the old days, I wrote mostly for IBM hardware and I must say
> they had the best manuals ever. I'm sure you remember how they always
> had a great example, and a cross reference to similar functions so if
> the one you were looking at didn't cut the mustard, one of the
> referenced functions would probably do it. Plus their manuals were
> always nearly perfect with hardly an error. It would be nice to see
> such documentation again but I fear they are something from the past
> and will never be seen again. In the old days, a language would remain
> virtually unchanged for a decade, now though a language can come into
> being, shine brightly and fade into obsolescence in a matter of a year
> or two, hardly enough time to really mature.
>
> I think this is a case of "Remember the good old days?"
>
> -John

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to