On 13.11.2023 18:49, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> Preferably this series should be applied via the i2c tree. > > Are we in a hurry here, i.e. does it block further development of the > i801 smbus driver? My gut feeling says the patches should rather go via > drm and fbdev trees, but I may be convinced otherwise. > We're not in a hurry. It's just my experience with patch series' affecting multiple subsystems that typically the decision was to apply the full series via one tree. Also to avoid inquires from maintainers like: Shall I take it or are you going to take it? Of course there may be different opinions. Please advise.
- [PATCH 00/20] remove I2C_CLASS_DDC support Heiner Kallweit
- Re: [PATCH 00/20] remove I2C_CLASS_DDC support Heiner Kallweit
- Re: [PATCH 00/20] remove I2C_CLASS_DDC support Alex Deucher
- [PATCH 03/20] drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/a... Heiner Kallweit
- Re: [PATCH 03/20] drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amd... Heiner Kallweit
- Re: [PATCH 03/20] drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amd... Alex Deucher
- [PATCH 07/20] drivers/gpu/drm: remove I2C_CLASS_DDC s... Heiner Kallweit
- Re: [PATCH 07/20] drivers/gpu/drm: remove I2C_CLA... Alex Deucher
- [PATCH 00/20] remove I2C_CLASS_DDC support Heiner Kallweit
- [PATCH v2 03/20] drm/amd/display: remove I2C_CLAS... Heiner Kallweit
- [PATCH v2 07/20] drivers/gpu/drm: remove I2C_CLAS... Heiner Kallweit
- [PATCH 00/20] remove I2C_CLASS_DDC support Heiner Kallweit