On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 02:09:05PM +0800, Wayne Lin wrote:
> [Why & How]
> The sequence for collecting down_reply/up_request from source
> perspective should be:
>
> Request_n->repeat (get partial reply of Request_n->clear message ready
> flag to ack DPRX that the message is received) till all partial
> replies for Request_n are received->new Request_n+1.
>
> While assembling partial reply packets, reading out DPCD DOWN_REP
> Sideband MSG buffer + clearing DOWN_REP_MSG_RDY flag should be
> wrapped up as a complete operation for reading out a reply packet.
> Kicking off a new request before clearing DOWN_REP_MSG_RDY flag might
> be risky. e.g. If the reply of the new request has overwritten the
> DPRX DOWN_REP Sideband MSG buffer before source writing ack to clear
> DOWN_REP_MSG_RDY flag, source then unintentionally flushes the reply
> for the new request. Should handle the up request in the same way.
>
> In drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq(), we don't clear MSG_RDY flag before caliing
> drm_dp_mst_kick_tx(). Fix that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <wayne....@amd.com>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> index 77277d90b6e2..5313a5656598 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> @@ -3166,6 +3166,8 @@ static void dm_handle_mst_sideband_msg(struct
> amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector)
> for (retry = 0; retry < 3; retry++) {
> uint8_t wret;
>
> + /* MSG_RDY ack is done in drm*/
> + esi[1] &= ~(DP_DOWN_REP_MSG_RDY |
> DP_UP_REQ_MSG_RDY);
> wret = drm_dp_dpcd_write(
> &aconnector->dm_dp_aux.aux,
> dpcd_addr + 1,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> index 51a46689cda7..02aad713c67c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> @@ -4054,6 +4054,9 @@ int drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr
> *mgr, u8 *esi, bool *handl
> {
> int ret = 0;
> int sc;
> + const int tosend = 1;
> + int retries = 0;
> + u8 buf = 0;
> *handled = false;
> sc = DP_GET_SINK_COUNT(esi[0]);
>
> @@ -4072,6 +4075,25 @@ int drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr
> *mgr, u8 *esi, bool *handl
> *handled = true;
> }
>
> + if (*handled) {
> + buf = esi[1] & (DP_DOWN_REP_MSG_RDY | DP_UP_REQ_MSG_RDY);
> + do {
> + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_write(mgr->aux,
> +
> DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0,
> + &buf,
> + tosend);
> +
> + if (ret == tosend)
> + break;
> +
> + retries++;
> + } while (retries < 5);
What's with this magic retry loop?
Not sure I like the whole thing though. Splitting the irq ack
semi-randomly between driver vs. multiple helpers doesn't feel
great to me.
As a whole the HPD_IRQ handling is a total mess atm. At some point
I was trying to sketch something a bit better for it. The approach
I was thinking was something along the lines of:
u8 vector[...];
drm_dp_read_irq_vector(vector);
... handle all irqs/etc., calling suitable helpers as needed
drm_dp_clear_irq_vector(vector);
And I was also thinking that this drm_dp_*_irq_vector() stuff
would always use the ESI layout, converting as needed from/to
the old layout for pre-1.2 (or whatever the cutoff was) devices.
That way drivers would just need the one codepath.
> +
> + if (ret != tosend)
> + drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev, "failed to write dpcd 0x%x\n",
> + DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0);
> + }
> +
> drm_dp_mst_kick_tx(mgr);
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index bf80f296a8fd..abec3de38b66 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -3939,6 +3939,9 @@ intel_dp_check_mst_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> if (!memchr_inv(ack, 0, sizeof(ack)))
> break;
>
> + /* MSG_RDY ack is done in drm*/
> + ack[1] &= ~(DP_DOWN_REP_MSG_RDY | DP_UP_REQ_MSG_RDY);
> +
> if (!intel_dp_ack_sink_irq_esi(intel_dp, ack))
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Failed to ack ESI\n");
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> index edcb2529b402..e905987104ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> @@ -1336,6 +1336,8 @@ nv50_mstm_service(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
> if (!handled)
> break;
>
> + /* MSG_RDY ack is done in drm*/
> + esi[1] &= ~(DP_DOWN_REP_MSG_RDY | DP_UP_REQ_MSG_RDY);
> rc = drm_dp_dpcd_write(aux, DP_SINK_COUNT_ESI + 1, &esi[1],
> 3);
> if (rc != 3) {
> --
> 2.37.3
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
