[AMD Official Use Only - General]

On 2022-05-11 00:08, Wentland, Harry wrote:
> From: Wentland, Harry <harry.wentl...@amd.com> 
>
> On 2022-05-10 14:34, Bhawanpreet Lakha wrote:
>> From: Bhawanpreet Lakha 
>> <bhawanpreet.la...@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
>> 
>> [Why]
>> we save the prev_dppclk value using "dpp_inst" but when reading this 
>> value we use the index "i". In a case where a pipe is fused off we can 
>> end up reading the incorrect instance because i != dpp_inst in this 
>> case.
>> 
>> [How]
>> read the prev_dppclk using dpp_inst instead of i
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha bhawanpreet.la...@amd.com
>> Reviewed-by: Dmytro Laktyushkin <dmytro.laktyush...@amd.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentl...@amd.com>
>
> Harry

Reviewed-by: Praful Swarnakar <praful.swarna...@amd.com>
Also, verified on various affected systems to confirm fix.

Regards,
Praful Swarnakar

>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn21/rn_clk_mgr.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn21/rn_clk_mgr.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn21/rn_clk_mgr.c
>> index 02943ca65807..cf1b5f354ae9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn21/rn_clk_mgr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn21/rn_clk_mgr.c
>> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static void rn_update_clocks_update_dpp_dto(struct 
>> clk_mgr_internal *clk_mgr,
>>              dpp_inst = clk_mgr->base.ctx->dc->res_pool->dpps[i]->inst;
>>              dppclk_khz = 
>> context->res_ctx.pipe_ctx[i].plane_res.bw.dppclk_khz;
>>  
>> -            prev_dppclk_khz = clk_mgr->dccg->pipe_dppclk_khz[i];
>> +            prev_dppclk_khz = clk_mgr->dccg->pipe_dppclk_khz[dpp_inst];
>>  
>>              if (safe_to_lower || prev_dppclk_khz < dppclk_khz)
>>                      clk_mgr->dccg->funcs->update_dpp_dto(

Reply via email to