On 2022-02-15 09:25, Christian König wrote:
> Am 15.02.22 um 00:21 schrieb Luben Tuikov:
>> Add the "harvest" field to the IP attributes in
>> the IP discovery sysfs visualization, as this
>> field is present in the binary data.
>>
>> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tui...@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c
>> index c8dbdb78988ce0..0496d369504641 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c
>> @@ -393,6 +393,7 @@ struct ip_hw_instance {
>> int hw_id;
>> u8 num_instance;
>> u8 major, minor, revision;
>> + u8 harvest;
>
> Should we maybe use bool here instead?
>
> Apart from that looks good to me.
Thanks Christian.
I don't mind using bool here.
I saw the field in the binary data is 4 bits and represented that.
Is the field actually bool in the IP binary data?
I can change the patch and resubmit.
Regards,
Luben
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>>
>> int num_base_addresses;
>> u32 base_addr[];
>> @@ -440,6 +441,11 @@ static ssize_t revision_show(struct ip_hw_instance
>> *ip_hw_instance, char *buf)
>> return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", ip_hw_instance->revision);
>> }
>>
>> +static ssize_t harvest_show(struct ip_hw_instance *ip_hw_instance, char
>> *buf)
>> +{
>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%01X\n", ip_hw_instance->harvest);
>> +}
>> +
>> static ssize_t num_base_addresses_show(struct ip_hw_instance
>> *ip_hw_instance, char *buf)
>> {
>> return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", ip_hw_instance->num_base_addresses);
>> @@ -471,6 +477,7 @@ static struct ip_hw_instance_attr ip_hw_attr[] = {
>> __ATTR_RO(major),
>> __ATTR_RO(minor),
>> __ATTR_RO(revision),
>> + __ATTR_RO(harvest),
>> __ATTR_RO(num_base_addresses),
>> __ATTR_RO(base_addr),
>> };
>> @@ -708,6 +715,7 @@ static int amdgpu_discovery_sysfs_ips(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>> ip_hw_instance->major = ip->major;
>> ip_hw_instance->minor = ip->minor;
>> ip_hw_instance->revision = ip->revision;
>> + ip_hw_instance->harvest = ip->harvest;
>> ip_hw_instance->num_base_addresses =
>> ip->num_base_address;
>>
>> for (kk = 0; kk < ip_hw_instance->num_base_addresses;
>> kk++)
>>
>> base-commit: d8604f1d237a145db48bae4ea60b85a5875df307
>
Regards,
--
Luben
