[Public]
Does the message need a mention about the newly added option to ignore
threshold?
Thanks,
Lijo
________________________________
From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> on behalf of Luben Tuikov
<luben.tui...@amd.com>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 9:32:20 PM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Tuikov, Luben <luben.tui...@amd.com>; Russell, Kent <kent.russ...@amd.com>;
Deucher, Alexander <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Restore information reporting in RAS
A recent patch took away the reporting of number of RAS records and
the threshold due to the way it was edited/spliced on top of the code.
This patch restores this reporting.
Cc: Kent Russell <kent.russ...@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
Fixes: 07df2fb092d09e ("drm/amdgpu: Add kernel parameter support for ignoring
bad page threshold")
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tui...@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
index ae64ca02ccc4f8..05117eda105b55 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
@@ -1112,7 +1112,10 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_init(struct
amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
res = 0;
} else {
*exceed_err_limit = true;
- dev_err(adev->dev, "GPU will not be
initialized. Replace this GPU or increase the threshold.");
+ dev_err(adev->dev,
+ "RAS records:%d exceed threshold:%d, "
+ "GPU will not be initialized. Replace
this GPU or increase the threshold",
+ control->ras_num_recs,
ras->bad_page_cnt_threshold);
}
}
} else {
base-commit: b60bccb408c831c685b2a257eff575bcda2cbe9d
--
2.33.1.558.g2bd2f258f4
