On 10/20/2021 10:05 PM, Kent Russell wrote:
If the bad_page_threshold kernel parameter is set to -2,
continue to post the GPU. Print a warning to dmesg that this action has
been done, and that page retirement will obviously not work for said GPU
Cc: Luben Tuikov <luben.tui...@amd.com>
Cc: Mukul Joshi <mukul.jo...@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Russell <kent.russ...@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
index 1ede0f0d6f55..31852330c1db 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
@@ -1115,11 +1115,16 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_init(struct
amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
res = amdgpu_ras_eeprom_correct_header_tag(control,
RAS_TABLE_HDR_VAL);
} else {
- *exceed_err_limit = true;
- dev_err(adev->dev,
- "RAS records:%d exceed threshold:%d, "
- "GPU will not be initialized. Replace this GPU or
increase the threshold",
+ dev_err(adev->dev, "RAS records:%d exceed threshold:%d",
control->ras_num_recs,
ras->bad_page_cnt_threshold);
+ if (amdgpu_bad_page_threshold == -2) {
+ dev_warn(adev->dev, "GPU will be initialized due to
bad_page_threshold = -2.");
+ dev_warn(adev->dev, "Page retirement will not work
for this GPU in this state.");
Now, this looks as good as booting with 0 = disable bad page retirement.
I thought page retirement will work as long as EEPROM has space, but it
won't bother about the threshold. If the intent is to ignore bad page
retirement, then 0 is good enough and -2 is not required.
Also, when user passes threshold=-2, what is the threshold being
compared against to say *exceed_err_limit = true?
Thanks,
Lijo
+ res = 0;
+ } else {
+ *exceed_err_limit = true;
+ dev_err(adev->dev, "GPU will not be initialized.
Replace this GPU or increase the threshold.");
+ }
}
} else {
DRM_INFO("Creating a new EEPROM table");
