[Public] Hello Guchun,
In most of those cases you are right it is redundant, the reason i kept them separate for now is to resolve this bug while also keeping those interfaces modular, and not affecting the psp submit sequence yet. We are planning a bigger change to that source to remove alot of the duplicate code regarding the cmd buffer prepare/submit flow and will probably go back down to one mutex there. Thank you, John Clements ________________________________ From: Chen, Guchun <guchun.c...@amd.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 3, 2021 9:58 PM To: Clements, John <john.cleme...@amd.com>; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org> Cc: Zhang, Hawking <hawking.zh...@amd.com>; Li, Candice <candice...@amd.com>; Lazar, Lijo <lijo.la...@amd.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: added synchronization for psp cmd buf access [Public] Before calling into psp_cmd_submit_buf, a mutex psp->cmd_buf_mutex is there, and after entering psp_cmd_submit_buf, there is another mutex psp->mutex, is it a bit redundant? Regards, Guchun From: Clements, John <john.cleme...@amd.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 3, 2021 5:50 PM To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Zhang, Hawking <hawking.zh...@amd.com>; Li, Candice <candice...@amd.com>; Lazar, Lijo <lijo.la...@amd.com>; Chen, Guchun <guchun.c...@amd.com> Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: added synchronization for psp cmd buf access [AMD Official Use Only] Submitting patch to synchronize access to psp cmd submission memory to resolve potential race conditions.
