No need to account for the 2 bytes of EEPROM
address--this is now well abstracted away by
the fixes the the lower layers.

Cc: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzov...@amd.com>
Cc: Alexander Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tui...@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
index dc48c556398039..7d0f9e1e62dc4f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_init(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control 
*control,
                return ret;
        }
 
-       __decode_table_header_from_buff(hdr, &buff[2]);
+       __decode_table_header_from_buff(hdr, buff);
 
        if (hdr->header == RAS_TABLE_HDR_VAL) {
                control->num_recs = (hdr->tbl_size - RAS_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE) /
-- 
2.32.0

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to