Well none. As I said I will push this upstream through drm-misc-next.

Christian.

Am 28.04.21 um 10:32 schrieb Deng, Emily:

[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]


Hi Alex and Christian,

What extra work Roy need to do about this patch? And fdinfo?

Best wishes

Emily Deng

*From:* amd-gfx <amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> *On Behalf Of *Deucher, Alexander
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 27, 2021 3:52 AM
*To:* Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com>
*Cc:* Sun, Roy <roy....@amd.com>; amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Nieto, David M <david.ni...@amd.com>
*Subject:* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/scheduler: Change scheduled fence track

[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]

[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]

Fair point. Either way works for me.

Alex

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*From:*Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com <mailto:ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com>>
*Sent:* Monday, April 26, 2021 3:48 PM
*To:* Deucher, Alexander <alexander.deuc...@amd.com <mailto:alexander.deuc...@amd.com>> *Cc:* amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org <mailto:amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>>; Sun, Roy <roy....@amd.com <mailto:roy....@amd.com>>; Nieto, David M <david.ni...@amd.com <mailto:david.ni...@amd.com>>
*Subject:* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/scheduler: Change scheduled fence track

My concern is more to get this tested from more people than just AMD.

Christian.

Am 26.04.21 um 21:40 schrieb Deucher, Alexander:

    [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]

    That said, it would be easier for me to merge through the AMD tree
    since a relatively big AMD feature depends on it.  Not sure how
    much conflict potential there is if this goes through the AMD tree.

    Alex

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    *From:*amd-gfx <amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org>
    <mailto:amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> on behalf of
    Deucher, Alexander <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
    <mailto:alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
    *Sent:* Monday, April 26, 2021 3:24 PM
    *To:* Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com>
    <mailto:ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com>
    *Cc:* amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
    <mailto:amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Sun, Roy <roy....@amd.com>
    <mailto:roy....@amd.com>; Nieto, David M <david.ni...@amd.com>
    <mailto:david.ni...@amd.com>
    *Subject:* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/scheduler: Change scheduled fence
    track

    [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]

    [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]

    No objections from me.

    Thanks!

    Alex

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    *From:*Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com>
    <mailto:ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com>
    *Sent:* Monday, April 26, 2021 2:49 AM
    *To:* Deucher, Alexander <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
    <mailto:alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
    *Cc:* Nieto, David M <david.ni...@amd.com>
    <mailto:david.ni...@amd.com>; Sun, Roy <roy....@amd.com>
    <mailto:roy....@amd.com>; amd-gfx list
    <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org> <mailto:amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
    *Subject:* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/scheduler: Change scheduled fence
    track

    Hey Alex,

    any objections that we merge those two patches through drm-misc-next?

    Thanks,
    Christian.

    Am 26.04.21 um 08:27 schrieb Roy Sun:
    > Update the timestamp of scheduled fence on HW
    > completion of the previous fences
    >
    > This allow more accurate tracking of the fence
    > execution in HW
    >
    > Signed-off-by: David M Nieto <david.ni...@amd.com>
    <mailto:david.ni...@amd.com>
    > Signed-off-by: Roy Sun <roy....@amd.com> <mailto:roy....@amd.com>
    > ---
    > drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 12 ++++++++++--
    >   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
    >
    > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
    b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
    > index 92d8de24d0a1..f8e39ab0c41b 100644
    > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
    > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
    > @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ void drm_sched_resubmit_jobs(struct
    drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
    > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_resubmit_jobs);
    >
    >   /**
    > - * drm_sched_resubmit_jobs_ext - helper to relunch certain
    number of jobs from mirror ring list
    > + * drm_sched_resubmit_jobs_ext - helper to relaunch certain
    number of jobs from pending list
    >    *
    >    * @sched: scheduler instance
    >    * @max: job numbers to relaunch
    > @@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ drm_sched_select_entity(struct
    drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
    >   static struct drm_sched_job *
    > drm_sched_get_cleanup_job(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
    >   {
    > -     struct drm_sched_job *job;
    > +     struct drm_sched_job *job, *next;
    >
    >        /*
    >         * Don't destroy jobs while the timeout worker is running
    OR thread
    > @@ -690,6 +690,14 @@ drm_sched_get_cleanup_job(struct
    drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
    >        if (job && dma_fence_is_signaled(&job->s_fence->finished)) {
    >                /* remove job from pending_list */
    > list_del_init(&job->list);
    > We just need to record the scheduled time of the next job. So we
    > need not to check the rest job.
    > +             /* account for the next fence in the queue */
    > +             next = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->pending_list,
    > + struct drm_sched_job, list);
    > +             if (next && test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT,
    > + &job->s_fence->finished.flags)) {
    > + next->s_fence->scheduled.timestamp =
    > + job->s_fence->finished.timestamp;
    > +             }
    >        } else {
    >                job = NULL;
    >                /* queue timeout for next job */


_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to