Dear Andi,
Am 03.08.19 um 02:09 schrieb Andi Kleen:
From: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>
I got tired of seeing a lot of radeon-crt kernel threads in ps on my
workstation, one for each CPU and one for each display, which never use any CPU
time.
Surely a single kernel thread is enough to handle the display.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
index bd52f15e6330..fb0ca688f6fe 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
@@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ static void radeon_crtc_init(struct drm_device *dev, int
index)
drm_mode_crtc_set_gamma_size(&radeon_crtc->base, 256);
radeon_crtc->crtc_id = index;
- radeon_crtc->flip_queue = alloc_workqueue("radeon-crtc", WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
+ radeon_crtc->flip_queue = alloc_workqueue("radeon-crtc",
WQ_HIGHPRI|WQ_UNBOUND, 0);
rdev->mode_info.crtcs[index] = radeon_crtc;
if (rdev->family >= CHIP_BONAIRE) {
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmen...@molgen.mpg.de>
Kind regards,
Paul
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
