On 2020-07-22 7:12 p.m., Alex Deucher wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:25 AM Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote: >> On 2020-07-22 3:10 p.m., Kazlauskas, Nicholas wrote: >>> On 2020-07-22 8:51 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 2:38 PM Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> From: Michel Dänzer <mdaen...@redhat.com> >>>>> >>>>> drm_atomic_crtc_check enforces that ::active can only be true if >>>>> ::enable is as well. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaen...@redhat.com> >>> >>> Looks fine to me. The check is sufficiently old enough that I don't mind >>> relying on the core for this either. >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlaus...@amd.com> >>> >>>> >>>> modeset vs modereset is a bit an inglorious name choice ... since this >>>> seems to be glue code and not part of core dc, maybe rename to >>>> enable_required/disable_required to keep it consistent with the >>>> wording atomic helpers use? DC also seems to use reset for a lot of >>>> other things already (state reset, like atomic, or gpu reset like >>>> drm/scheduler's td_r_), so I think this would also help clarity from a >>>> DC perspective. >>>> >>>> Patch itself is good, above just an idea for another patch on top. >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> >> >> Thanks for the reviews! I assume this will get picked up by a DC >> developer or Alex/Christian. > > Applied. Thanks!
Thank you. Can't see it in the DRM changes for 5.9 though. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | https://redhat.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
