From: Likun Gao <likun....@amd.com>

PCIE parameters should be override to fix the conflict between the ASIC
capabilities and the system capabilities.

Signed-off-by: Likun Gao <likun....@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Gui Chengming <jack....@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.hu...@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
index 118347c..876b688 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 #include "soc15_common.h"
 #include "smu_v11_0.h"
 #include "atom.h"
+#include "amd_pcie.h"
 
 int smu_dpm_set_power_gate(struct smu_context *smu, uint32_t block_type,
                           bool gate)
@@ -533,6 +534,47 @@ static int smu_fini_fb_allocations(struct smu_context *smu)
        return 0;
 }
 
+static int smu_override_pcie_parameters(struct smu_context *smu)
+{
+       struct amdgpu_device *adev = smu->adev;
+       uint32_t pcie_gen = 0, pcie_width = 0, smu_pcie_arg;
+       int ret;
+
+       if (adev->pm.pcie_gen_mask & CAIL_PCIE_LINK_SPEED_SUPPORT_GEN4)
+               pcie_gen = 3;
+       else if (adev->pm.pcie_gen_mask & CAIL_PCIE_LINK_SPEED_SUPPORT_GEN3)
+               pcie_gen = 2;
+       else if (adev->pm.pcie_gen_mask & CAIL_PCIE_LINK_SPEED_SUPPORT_GEN2)
+               pcie_gen = 1;
+       else if (adev->pm.pcie_gen_mask & CAIL_PCIE_LINK_SPEED_SUPPORT_GEN1)
+               pcie_gen = 0;
+
+       /* Bit 31:16: LCLK DPM level. 0 is DPM0, and 1 is DPM1
+        * Bit 15:8:  PCIE GEN, 0 to 3 corresponds to GEN1 to GEN4
+        * Bit 7:0:   PCIE lane width, 1 to 7 corresponds is x1 to x32
+        */
+       if (adev->pm.pcie_mlw_mask & CAIL_PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SUPPORT_X16)
+               pcie_width = 6;
+       else if (adev->pm.pcie_mlw_mask & CAIL_PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SUPPORT_X12)
+               pcie_width = 5;
+       else if (adev->pm.pcie_mlw_mask & CAIL_PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SUPPORT_X8)
+               pcie_width = 4;
+       else if (adev->pm.pcie_mlw_mask & CAIL_PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SUPPORT_X4)
+               pcie_width = 3;
+       else if (adev->pm.pcie_mlw_mask & CAIL_PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SUPPORT_X2)
+               pcie_width = 2;
+       else if (adev->pm.pcie_mlw_mask & CAIL_PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SUPPORT_X1)
+               pcie_width = 1;
+
+       smu_pcie_arg = (1 << 16) | (pcie_gen << 8) | pcie_width;
+       ret = smu_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu,
+                                         SMU_MSG_OverridePcieParameters,
+                                         smu_pcie_arg);
+       if (ret)
+               pr_err("[%s] Attempt to override pcie params failed!\n", 
__func__);
+       return ret;
+}
+
 static int smu_smc_table_hw_init(struct smu_context *smu,
                                 bool initialize)
 {
@@ -620,6 +662,10 @@ static int smu_smc_table_hw_init(struct smu_context *smu,
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
+       ret = smu_override_pcie_parameters(smu);
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;
+
        ret = smu_notify_display_change(smu);
        if (ret)
                return ret;
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to