See comment [Oak]

Thanks,
Oak

-----Original Message-----
From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Christian 
König
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 7:36 AM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/11] drm/amdgpu: send IVs to the KFD only after processing 
them v2

This allows us to filter out VM faults in the GMC code.

v2: don't filter out all faults

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_irq.c | 29 +++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_irq.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_irq.c
index 6b6524f04ce0..6db4c58ddc13 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_irq.c
@@ -149,9 +149,6 @@ static void amdgpu_irq_callback(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
        if (!amdgpu_ih_prescreen_iv(adev))
                return;
 
-       /* Before dispatching irq to IP blocks, send it to amdkfd */
-       amdgpu_amdkfd_interrupt(adev, (const void *) &ih->ring[ring_index]);
-
        entry.iv_entry = (const uint32_t *)&ih->ring[ring_index];
        amdgpu_ih_decode_iv(adev, &entry);
 
@@ -371,29 +368,31 @@ void amdgpu_irq_dispatch(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
        unsigned client_id = entry->client_id;
        unsigned src_id = entry->src_id;
        struct amdgpu_irq_src *src;
+       bool handled = false;
        int r;
 
        trace_amdgpu_iv(entry);
 
        if (client_id >= AMDGPU_IRQ_CLIENTID_MAX) {
-               DRM_DEBUG("Invalid client_id in IV: %d\n", client_id);
+               DRM_ERROR("Invalid client_id in IV: %d\n", client_id);
                return;
        }
 
        if (src_id >= AMDGPU_MAX_IRQ_SRC_ID) {
-               DRM_DEBUG("Invalid src_id in IV: %d\n", src_id);
+               DRM_ERROR("Invalid src_id in IV: %d\n", src_id);
                return;
        }
 
        if (adev->irq.virq[src_id]) {
                generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(adev->irq.domain, src_id));
-       } else {
-               if (!adev->irq.client[client_id].sources) {
-                       DRM_DEBUG("Unregistered interrupt client_id: %d src_id: 
%d\n",
-                                 client_id, src_id);
-                       return;
-               }
+               return;
+       }
 
+       if (!adev->irq.client[client_id].sources) {
+               DRM_DEBUG("Unregistered interrupt client_id: %d src_id: %d\n",
+                         client_id, src_id);
+               return;
+       } else {
[Oak]: you probably don't need a else because the return in above if. 
                src = adev->irq.client[client_id].sources[src_id];
                if (!src) {
                        DRM_DEBUG("Unhandled interrupt src_id: %d\n", src_id); 
@@ -401,9 +400,15 @@ void amdgpu_irq_dispatch(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
                }
 
                r = src->funcs->process(adev, src, entry);
-               if (r)
+               if (r < 0)
                        DRM_ERROR("error processing interrupt (%d)\n", r);
+               else if (r)
+                       handled = true;
        }
+
+       /* Send it to amdkfd as well if it isn't already handled */
+       if (!handled)
[Oak]: Kfd cares about followed interrupt source/client. How can we guarantee 
that those are not handled by registered interrupt handler at amdgpu level?
                source_id == SOC15_INTSRC_CP_END_OF_PIPE ||
                source_id == SOC15_INTSRC_SDMA_TRAP ||
                source_id == SOC15_INTSRC_SQ_INTERRUPT_MSG ||
                source_id == SOC15_INTSRC_CP_BAD_OPCODE ||
                client_id == SOC15_IH_CLIENTID_VMC ||
                client_id == SOC15_IH_CLIENTID_UTCL2;

To completely avoid this, we should remove the amdgpu_amdkfd_interrupt 
function. Instead, kfd interrupt handling functions should be splitted and 
registered to adev->irq.client[].sources[]

+               amdgpu_amdkfd_interrupt(adev, entry->iv_entry);
 }
 
 /**
--
2.17.1

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to