Dear Michał,
Thank you for documenting the function. Do you mean *to* instead of *do*
in the commit message summary?
On 09/01/18 16:08, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> Document remove_conflicting_framebuffers() behaviour.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl>
> ---
> drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> index 0df148eb4699..2de93b5014e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> @@ -1775,6 +1775,16 @@ int unlink_framebuffer(struct fb_info *fb_info)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlink_framebuffer);
>
> +/**
> + * remove_conflicting_framebuffers - remove firmware-configured framebuffers
> + * @a: memory range, users of which are to be removed
> + * @name: requesting driver name
> + * @primary: also kick vga16fb if present
> + *
> + * This function removes framebuffer devices (initialized by
> firmware/bootloader)
> + * which use memory range described by @a. If @a is NULL all such devices are
> + * removed.
> + */
> int remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a,
> const char *name, bool primary)
> {
Acked-by: Paul Menzel <pmen...@molgen.mpg.de>
Kind regards,
Paul
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
