On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Kuehling, Felix <felix.kuehl...@amd.com> wrote: >> Thanks Felix. >> I'll add it to the next tree instead of the one from the patch-set. >> >> Oded > > I based this patch on your current amdkfd-next. Do you have another "next > tree"? No, that's fine. I simply squashed this patch with the original patch because its kind of redundant to have two patches in the same time that change the function's API to two different formats.
Oded > > Regards, > Felix > > -----Original Message----- > From: Oded Gabbay [mailto:oded.gab...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 12:36 AM > To: Kuehling, Felix > Cc: amd-gfx list > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: Make queue mapping interfaces more consistent > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehl...@amd.com> > wrote: >> Pass unmap filter parameters directly to execute_queues_cpsch, same as >> unmap_queues_cpsch. >> >> Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehl...@amd.com> >> --- >> .../gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c | 32 >> +++++++++++----------- >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c >> index 933adb5..da3b743 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c >> @@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ static int create_compute_queue_nocpsch(struct >> device_queue_manager *dqm, >> struct qcm_process_device >> *qpd); >> >> static int execute_queues_cpsch(struct device_queue_manager *dqm, >> - bool static_queues_included); >> + enum kfd_unmap_queues_filter filter, >> + uint32_t filter_param); >> static int unmap_queues_cpsch(struct device_queue_manager *dqm, >> enum kfd_unmap_queues_filter filter, >> uint32_t filter_param); @@ -741,7 >> +742,7 @@ static int start_cpsch(struct device_queue_manager *dqm) >> init_interrupts(dqm); >> >> mutex_lock(&dqm->lock); >> - execute_queues_cpsch(dqm, false); >> + execute_queues_cpsch(dqm, >> + KFD_UNMAP_QUEUES_FILTER_DYNAMIC_QUEUES, 0); >> mutex_unlock(&dqm->lock); >> >> return 0; >> @@ -787,7 +788,7 @@ static int create_kernel_queue_cpsch(struct >> device_queue_manager *dqm, >> list_add(&kq->list, &qpd->priv_queue_list); >> dqm->queue_count++; >> qpd->is_debug = true; >> - execute_queues_cpsch(dqm, false); >> + execute_queues_cpsch(dqm, >> + KFD_UNMAP_QUEUES_FILTER_DYNAMIC_QUEUES, 0); >> mutex_unlock(&dqm->lock); >> >> return 0; >> @@ -801,7 +802,7 @@ static void destroy_kernel_queue_cpsch(struct >> device_queue_manager *dqm, >> list_del(&kq->list); >> dqm->queue_count--; >> qpd->is_debug = false; >> - execute_queues_cpsch(dqm, true); >> + execute_queues_cpsch(dqm, KFD_UNMAP_QUEUES_FILTER_ALL_QUEUES, >> + 0); >> /* >> * Unconditionally decrement this counter, regardless of the queue's >> * type. >> @@ -859,7 +860,8 @@ static int create_queue_cpsch(struct >> device_queue_manager *dqm, struct queue *q, >> qpd->queue_count++; >> if (q->properties.is_active) { >> dqm->queue_count++; >> - retval = execute_queues_cpsch(dqm, false); >> + retval = execute_queues_cpsch(dqm, >> + >> + KFD_UNMAP_QUEUES_FILTER_DYNAMIC_QUEUES, 0); >> } >> >> if (q->properties.type == KFD_QUEUE_TYPE_SDMA) @@ -964,16 >> +966,12 @@ static int unmap_queues_cpsch(struct device_queue_manager >> *dqm, >> >> /* dqm->lock mutex has to be locked before calling this function */ >> static int execute_queues_cpsch(struct device_queue_manager *dqm, >> - bool static_queues_included) >> + enum kfd_unmap_queues_filter filter, >> + uint32_t filter_param) >> { >> int retval; >> - enum kfd_unmap_queues_filter filter; >> - >> - filter = static_queues_included ? >> - KFD_UNMAP_QUEUES_FILTER_ALL_QUEUES : >> - KFD_UNMAP_QUEUES_FILTER_DYNAMIC_QUEUES; >> >> - retval = unmap_queues_cpsch(dqm, filter, 0); >> + retval = unmap_queues_cpsch(dqm, filter, filter_param); >> if (retval) { >> pr_err("The cp might be in an unrecoverable state due to an >> unsuccessful queues preemption\n"); >> return retval; >> @@ -1024,7 +1022,8 @@ static int destroy_queue_cpsch(struct >> device_queue_manager *dqm, >> if (q->properties.is_active) >> dqm->queue_count--; >> >> - retval = execute_queues_cpsch(dqm, false); >> + retval = execute_queues_cpsch(dqm, >> + >> + KFD_UNMAP_QUEUES_FILTER_DYNAMIC_QUEUES, 0); >> if (retval == -ETIME) >> qpd->reset_wavefronts = true; >> >> @@ -1157,7 +1156,8 @@ static int process_termination_cpsch(struct >> device_queue_manager *dqm, >> struct kernel_queue *kq, *kq_next; >> struct mqd_manager *mqd; >> struct device_process_node *cur, *next_dpn; >> - bool unmap_static_queues = false; >> + enum kfd_unmap_queues_filter filter = >> + KFD_UNMAP_QUEUES_FILTER_DYNAMIC_QUEUES; >> >> retval = 0; >> >> @@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@ static int process_termination_cpsch(struct >> device_queue_manager *dqm, >> dqm->queue_count--; >> qpd->is_debug = false; >> dqm->total_queue_count--; >> - unmap_static_queues = true; >> + filter = KFD_UNMAP_QUEUES_FILTER_ALL_QUEUES; >> } >> >> /* Clear all user mode queues */ @@ -1193,7 +1193,7 @@ static >> int process_termination_cpsch(struct device_queue_manager *dqm, >> } >> } >> >> - retval = execute_queues_cpsch(dqm, unmap_static_queues); >> + retval = execute_queues_cpsch(dqm, filter, 0); >> if (retval || qpd->reset_wavefronts) { >> pr_warn("Resetting wave fronts (cpsch) on dev %p\n", >> dqm->dev); >> dbgdev_wave_reset_wavefronts(dqm->dev, >> qpd->pqm->process); >> -- >> 2.7.4 >> > > Thanks Felix. > I'll add it to the next tree instead of the one from the patch-set. > > Oded _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
