On 3/11/2026 12:47 PM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
On 3/11/26 11:19, Pratap Nirujogi wrote:
Add NULL pointer checks for dev->type before accessing
dev->type->name in ISP genpd add/remove functions to
prevent kernel crashes.
This regression was introduced in v7.0 as the wakeup sources
are registered using physical device instead of ACPI device.
This led to adding wakeup source device as the first child of
AMDGPU device without initializing dev-type variable, and
resulted in segfault when accessed it in the amdgpu isp driver.
Fixes: 057edc58aa59 ("ACPI: PM: Register wakeup sources under physical
devices")
Co-developed-by: Bin Du <[email protected]>
Did this pass checkpatch? In order to use C-d-b this should have Bin's
S-o-b I would expect too. If it was just his original idea for the
issue and you implemented it a better tag would be Suggested-by.
I missed the warning checkpatch reported, will fix it in v2. Sure, will
use Suggested-by tag as well.
Thanks,
Pratap
Signed-off-by: Pratap Nirujogi <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/isp_v4_1_1.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/isp_v4_1_1.c b/drivers/gpu/
drm/amd/amdgpu/isp_v4_1_1.c
index b3590b33cab9e..485ecdec96184 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/isp_v4_1_1.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/isp_v4_1_1.c
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static int isp_genpd_add_device(struct device
*dev, void *data)
if (!pdev)
return -EINVAL;
- if (!dev->type->name) {
+ if (!dev->type || !dev->type->name) {
drm_dbg(&adev->ddev, "Invalid device type to add\n");
goto exit;
}
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int isp_genpd_remove_device(struct device
*dev, void *data)
if (!pdev)
return -EINVAL;
- if (!dev->type->name) {
+ if (!dev->type || !dev->type->name) {
drm_dbg(&adev->ddev, "Invalid device type to remove\n");
goto exit;
}
