On Thu, 2026-02-26 at 14:48 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On 2/26/26 10:55 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Update format strings from %ld/%lu to %lld/%llu for i_ino, which is
> > now a u64.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  fs/nfsd/export.c    | 2 +-
> >  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 4 ++--
> >  fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c     | 4 ++--
> >  fs/nfsd/vfs.c       | 2 +-
> >  4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/export.c b/fs/nfsd/export.c
> > index 
> > 8fdbba7cad96443d92cc7fdeea6158c4cc681be1..334b63eb966e71e6af6adde61aa1123f01b4390b
> >  100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/export.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/export.c
> > @@ -1039,7 +1039,7 @@ exp_rootfh(struct net *net, struct auth_domain *clp, 
> > char *name,
> >     }
> >     inode = d_inode(path.dentry);
> >  
> > -   dprintk("nfsd: exp_rootfh(%s [%p] %s:%s/%ld)\n",
> > +   dprintk("nfsd: exp_rootfh(%s [%p] %s:%s/%lld)\n",
> >              name, path.dentry, clp->name,
> >              inode->i_sb->s_id, inode->i_ino);
> >     exp = exp_parent(cd, clp, &path);
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > index 
> > 6b9c399b89dfb71a52b9c97f0efe9a1dea0558a6..a569d89ac9123d66bb47e7d74c7c98610de21da2
> >  100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > @@ -1253,7 +1253,7 @@ static void nfsd4_finalize_deleg_timestamps(struct 
> > nfs4_delegation *dp, struct f
> >     if (ret) {
> >             struct inode *inode = file_inode(f);
> >  
> > -           pr_notice_ratelimited("nfsd: Unable to update timestamps on 
> > inode %02x:%02x:%lu: %d\n",
> > +           pr_notice_ratelimited("nfsd: Unable to update timestamps on 
> > inode %02x:%02x:%llu: %d\n",
> >                                     MAJOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev),
> >                                     MINOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev),
> >                                     inode->i_ino, ret);
> > @@ -2888,7 +2888,7 @@ static void nfs4_show_superblock(struct seq_file *s, 
> > struct nfsd_file *f)
> >  {
> >     struct inode *inode = file_inode(f->nf_file);
> >  
> > -   seq_printf(s, "superblock: \"%02x:%02x:%ld\"",
> > +   seq_printf(s, "superblock: \"%02x:%02x:%llu\"",
> >                                     MAJOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev),
> >                                      MINOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev),
> >                                      inode->i_ino);
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
> > index 
> > ed85dd43da18e6d4c4667ff14dc035f2eacff1d6..cfd143b41eb1fb53868f378d668905c1c7d5f868
> >  100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
> > @@ -601,9 +601,9 @@ fh_compose(struct svc_fh *fhp, struct svc_export *exp, 
> > struct dentry *dentry,
> >     struct inode * inode = d_inode(dentry);
> >     dev_t ex_dev = exp_sb(exp)->s_dev;
> >  
> > -   dprintk("nfsd: fh_compose(exp %02x:%02x/%ld %pd2, ino=%ld)\n",
> > +   dprintk("nfsd: fh_compose(exp %02x:%02x/%lld %pd2, ino=%lld)\n",
> >             MAJOR(ex_dev), MINOR(ex_dev),
> > -           (long) d_inode(exp->ex_path.dentry)->i_ino,
> > +           (long long) d_inode(exp->ex_path.dentry)->i_ino,
> >             dentry,
> >             (inode ? inode->i_ino : 0));
> >  
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > index 
> > c884c3f34afb044ee5cacc962a04a97de2f7fd88..dde09f3734c2844a3fe0b6d18d596276a19aa2d1
> >  100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > @@ -1163,7 +1163,7 @@ nfsd_direct_read(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct 
> > svc_fh *fhp,
> >     } else if (unlikely(host_err == -EINVAL)) {
> >             struct inode *inode = d_inode(fhp->fh_dentry);
> >  
> > -           pr_info_ratelimited("nfsd: Direct I/O alignment failure on 
> > %s/%ld\n",
> > +           pr_info_ratelimited("nfsd: Direct I/O alignment failure on 
> > %s/%lld\n",
> >                                 inode->i_sb->s_id, inode->i_ino);
> >             host_err = -ESERVERFAULT;
> >     }
> > 
> 
> Suggestion: Let's use the %llu format specifier consistently for
> inode->i_ino, which is unsigned.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
> 

Good plan. I'll have claude do a pass for that in the next set.
-- 
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>

Reply via email to