[Public]

> From: Alex Deucher <alexdeuc...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2025 5:34 AM
> To: Liang, Prike <prike.li...@amd.com>
> Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Deucher, Alexander
> <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>; Koenig, Christian <christian.koe...@amd.com>;
> Lazar, Lijo <lijo.la...@amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] drm/amdgpu: bail out for userq unmap error
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 3:55 AM Prike Liang <prike.li...@amd.com> wrote:
> >
> > Before destroy the userq buffer object requires validating the userq
> > unmap status.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <prike.li...@amd.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c
> > index f67969312c39..8eea0e1e1b6a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c
> > @@ -319,6 +319,12 @@ amdgpu_userq_destroy(struct drm_file *filp, int
> queue_id)
> >         }
> >         amdgpu_bo_unref(&queue->db_obj.obj);
> >         r = amdgpu_userq_unmap_helper(uq_mgr, queue);
> > +       if (r != AMDGPU_USERQ_STATE_UNMAPPED) {
> > +               drm_dbg_driver(adev_to_drm(uq_mgr->adev), "Can't unmap the 
> > queue
> for destroying.\n");
> > +               mutex_unlock(&uq_mgr->userq_mutex);
> > +               /*TODO: before return may need to a reset*/
> > +               return r;
>
> If we return early here, we'll leak memory.  Presumably if the unmap failed, 
> the
> queue is hung, so it shouldn't cause any problems.

[Prike] Yeah, maybe it only requires an aware here and then continue destroying 
the userq software resources.
Do we need to reset the queue when unmap fails during userq destroy?

> Alex
>
> > +       }
> >         amdgpu_userq_cleanup(uq_mgr, queue, queue_id);
> >         mutex_unlock(&uq_mgr->userq_mutex);
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >

Reply via email to