On Thu, 10. Apr 11:07, Christian König wrote:
> Am 09.04.25 um 19:27 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> > The VM layer allows larger allocations. But the "this is a simple
> > allocation, choose kmalloc or vmalloc automatically based on size"
> > helper says "you are being simple, I'm going to check your arguments
> > are actually sane".
> >
> > So the drm code can easily have a function that validates the input
> > for your specific cases, and then you (a) don't need the helper
> > function that does the overflow protection and (b) don't want it.
> >
> > But it should actually validate arguments for real sanity at that
> > point. Not just open-code kvmalloc() without the sanity check.
> 
> Yeah, exactly that has been proposed by driver maintainers before and we just 
> rejected it on the subsystem maintainers level.
> 
> For this particular use case here I will propose some hopefully high enough 
> hard coded limit, but I can't guarantee that this will work for all use cases.

FWIW, the current code anyway has this limit being some sort of 4Gb, not
more.

The resulting calculation of `bytes` wraps at 32 bits albeit itself being
of type *unsigned long*.

        /* copy the handle array from userspace to a kernel buffer */
        r = -EFAULT;
        if (likely(info_size == in->bo_info_size)) {
                unsigned long bytes = in->bo_number *
                        in->bo_info_size;

                if (copy_from_user(info, uptr, bytes))
                        goto error_free;

Reply via email to