On 3/21/2025 14:36, Russell, Kent wrote:
Do we want to actually do a fence_wait_polling before the loop begins like in all of the other functions? I know 5ms isn't a big deal, but the other ones we have are all after a single fence_wait_polling first.
Oh I see what you're saying now. This introduces an unconditional 5ms delay before the first poll. D'oh, I'll send a v2. Thanks for the catch.
