Even though fini returns 0 always it could theoretically
fail in the future.  Might as well return it instead of 0.

Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <tom.stde...@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
index 0766dad1fafe..7ca9cbec3004 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
@@ -795,9 +795,7 @@ static int gmc_v9_0_suspend(void *handle)
 {
        struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle;
 
-       gmc_v9_0_hw_fini(adev);
-
-       return 0;
+       return gmc_v9_0_hw_fini(adev);
 }
 
 static int gmc_v9_0_resume(void *handle)
-- 
2.12.0

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to