> 2025年1月3日 14:19，Chen, Xiaogang <xiaogang.c...@amd.com> 写道：
>
>
>
> On 1/2/2025 11:55 PM, Gerry Liu wrote:
>>
>>
>>> 2025年1月3日 13:44，Chen, Xiaogang <xiaogang.c...@amd.com
>>> <mailto:xiaogang.c...@amd.com>> 写道：
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/2/2025 8:22 PM, Gerry Liu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> 2025年1月3日 07:08，Chen, Xiaogang <xiaogang.c...@amd.com
>>>>> <mailto:xiaogang.c...@amd.com>> 写道：
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/1/2025 11:36 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>>>>> On error recover path during device probe, it may trigger invalid
>>>>>> memory access as below:
>>>>>> 024-12-25 12:00:53 [ 2703.773040] general protection fault, probably for
>>>>>> non-canonical address 0x52445f4749464e4f: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:53 [ 2703.785199] CPU: 157 PID: 151951 Comm: rmmod
>>>>>> Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W OE 5.10.134-17.2.al8.x86_64 #1
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:53 [ 2703.797515] Hardware name: Alibaba Alibaba Cloud
>>>>>> ECS/Alibaba Cloud ECS, BIOS 3.0.ES.AL.P.087.05 04/07/2024
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:53 [ 2703.809188] RIP:
>>>>>> 0010:kgd2kfd_device_exit+0x6/0x60 [amdgpu]
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:53 [ 2703.816136] Code: ff 48 c7 83 38 01 00 00 80 45
>>>>>> e4 c0 c7 83 40 01 00 00 08 0f 00 00 e9 cd fa ff ff 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00
>>>>>> 00 00 0f
>>>>>> 1f 44 00 00 55 <80> bf 28 01 00 00 00 48 89 fd 75 09 48 89 ef 5d e9 65
>>>>>> df 9d f4 8b
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.838622] RSP: 0018:ffffb5313df07e10 EFLAGS:
>>>>>> 00010202
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.845216] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX:
>>>>>> ffff97ad689a3ff0 RCX: 0000000080400014
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.853935] RDX: 0000000080400015 RSI:
>>>>>> ffff97ad627e93d8 RDI: 52445f4749464e4f
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.862652] RBP: ffff97ad689a3ff0 R08:
>>>>>> 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffffb5814c00
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.871368] R10: ffff97ad627e9280 R11:
>>>>>> 0000000000000001 R12: ffffb5313df07e98
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.880068] R13: ffff97ad689a1810 R14:
>>>>>> 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.888768] FS: 00007fa4db81e740(0000)
>>>>>> GS:ffff98a93ec80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.898547] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0:
>>>>>> 0000000080050033
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.905684] CR2: 00007f4502deca00 CR3:
>>>>>> 000001008fc50001 CR4: 0000000002770ee0
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.914382] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1:
>>>>>> 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.923066] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6:
>>>>>> 00000000fffe07f0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.931746] PKRU: 55555554
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.935444] Call Trace:
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.938962]
>>>>>> amdgpu_amdkfd_device_fini_sw+0x1a/0x40 [amdgpu]
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.946080]
>>>>>> amdgpu_device_ip_fini.isra.0+0x3d/0x1b0 [amdgpu]
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.953278] amdgpu_device_fini_sw+0x2a/0x240
>>>>>> [amdgpu]
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.959789] amdgpu_driver_release_kms+0x12/0x30
>>>>>> [amdgpu]
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.966501] devm_drm_dev_init_release+0x42/0x70
>>>>>> [drm]
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.972891] release_nodes+0x6e/0xb0
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.977522] amdgpu_xcp_drv_release+0x38/0x80
>>>>>> [amdxcp]
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.983906]
>>>>>> __do_sys_delete_module.constprop.0+0x138/0x2a0
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.990775] ? exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xd6/0x120
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2703.996563] do_syscall_64+0x2e/0x50
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2704.001166]
>>>>>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x62/0xc7
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2704.007432] RIP: 0033:0x7fa4db2620cb
>>>>>> 2024-12-25 12:00:54 [ 2704.012025] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d a5 6d 19 00
>>>>>> f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e
>>>>>> fa b8 b0
>>>>>> 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 75 6d 19 00 f7 d8
>>>>>> 64 89 01 48
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <ge...@linux.alibaba.com>
>>>>>> <mailto:ge...@linux.alibaba.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c | 7 ++++++-
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
>>>>>> index b6c5ffd4630b..58c1b5fcf785 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c
>>>>>> @@ -663,6 +663,8 @@ static void kfd_cleanup_nodes(struct kfd_dev *kfd,
>>>>>> unsigned int num_nodes)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> for (i = 0; i < num_nodes; i++) {
>>>>>> knode = kfd->nodes[i];
>>>>>> + if (!knode)
>>>>>> + continue;
>>>>> I wonder how knode can be null here? kfd_cleanup_nodes is called by
>>>>> kgd2kfd_device_exit under condition if (kfd->init_complete).
>>>>> kfd->init_complete is true only after all kfd node got initialized at
>>>>> kgd2kfd_device_init. If kfd driver init fail kfd->init_complete would be
>>>>> false, then kfd_cleanup_node would not get called.
>>>>>
>>>> Hi Xiaogang,
>>>> It may get triggered on error handling path of ‘kid2kfd_device_init()`,
>>>> when it jump to label `node_alloc_error` and
>>>> then call `kfd_cleanup_nodes()`.
>>>>
>>> If it was the case kzalloc failed. That means there is no memory available
>>> even to allocate struct kfd_node. From the backtrace the general protection
>>> fault happened at
>>>
>>> RIP: 0010:kgd2kfd_device_exit+0x6/0x60 [amdgpu]
>>>
>>> It happened during driver module got released, not init time. I do not see
>>> how the patch is related to the issue you talked.
>> Aha, it’s caused by another bug which got fixed by "[PATCH 4/6] amdgpu: fix
>> use after free bug related to amdgpu_driver_release_kms()”.
>> Without the fix in "[PATCH 4/6] amdgpu: fix use after free bug related to
>> amdgpu_driver_release_kms()”, kgd2kfd_device_exit() will got called
>> twice in case of device probe failure. I caused me some time to figure out
>> the double free issue.
>> Actually we should reset kfd->init_completed to false in function
>> kgd2kfd_device_exit().
> We can set kfd->init_completed = false at end of kgd2kfd_device_exit, but how
> kgd2kfd_device_exit was called two times? is there another bug caused that?
>
I guess it caused by another bug related to the way amdgpu cooperates with the
amdgpu_xcp driver. It would be better to enhance amdgpu_xcp driver either.
> Regards
>
> Xiaogang
>
>
>>
>>> Regards
>>> Xiaogang
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Gerry
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Xiaogang
>>>>>
>>>>>> device_queue_manager_uninit(knode->dqm);
>>>>>> kfd_interrupt_exit(knode);
>>>>>> kfd_topology_remove_device(knode);
>>>>>> @@ -954,7 +956,10 @@ void kgd2kfd_device_exit(struct kfd_dev *kfd)
>>>>>> kfd_doorbell_fini(kfd);
>>>>>> ida_destroy(&kfd->doorbell_ida);
>>>>>> kfd_gtt_sa_fini(kfd);
>>>>>> - amdgpu_amdkfd_free_gtt_mem(kfd->adev, &kfd->gtt_mem);
>>>>>> + if (kfd->gtt_mem) {
>>>>>> + amdgpu_amdkfd_free_gtt_mem(kfd->adev,
>>>>>> &kfd->gtt_mem);
>>>>>> + kfd->gtt_mem = NULL;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> kfree(kfd);
>>>>
>>
