The left shift of int 32 bit integer constant 1 is evaluated using 32 bit
arithmetic and then assigned to and operated upon using a 64 bit unsigned
integer. In the case where the shift is 32 or more this can lead to an
overflow. Avoid this by shifting using the BIT_ULL macro instead.

Fixes: f0b19b84d391 ("drm/amdgpu: add amdgpu_jpeg_sched_mask debugfs")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.k...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c
index 95e2796919fc..136a0c8d8c7a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c
@@ -357,14 +357,14 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_jpeg_sched_mask_set(void *data, 
u64 val)
        if (!adev)
                return -ENODEV;
 
-       mask = (1 << (adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_inst * adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings)) - 
1;
+       mask = (BIT_ULL(adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_inst * adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings)) 
- 1;
        if ((val & mask) == 0)
                return -EINVAL;
 
        for (i = 0; i < adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_inst; ++i) {
                for (j = 0; j < adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings; ++j) {
                        ring = &adev->jpeg.inst[i].ring_dec[j];
-                       if (val & (1 << ((i * adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings) + j)))
+                       if (val & BIT_ULL((i * adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings) + j))
                                ring->sched.ready = true;
                        else
                                ring->sched.ready = false;
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_jpeg_sched_mask_get(void *data, 
u64 *val)
                for (j = 0; j < adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings; ++j) {
                        ring = &adev->jpeg.inst[i].ring_dec[j];
                        if (ring->sched.ready)
-                               mask |= 1 << ((i * adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings) + 
j);
+                               mask |= BIT_ULL((i * adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings) 
+ j);
                }
        }
        *val = mask;
-- 
2.39.5

Reply via email to