OK. Then, is it expected to have a validation failure with the current firmware?
Yeah, that won't work. We never released the firmware with the header for SI parts.

See for CIK we have upper and lower case firmware files, the lower case are the new ones with the header.

I've been using VCE2 port as my template for VCE1. My initial intention was to work on UVD, but I ended up plugging in VCE in the first place. UVD is on my todo list right next, I was expecting to working on it after fixing the VCE part.
That stuff would be really nice to get fixed. But i fear you won't get far without AMD internal help. I will see what I can do about that.

Thanks for the effort,
Christian.

Am 14.06.2017 um 19:30 schrieb Alexandre Demers:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 at 13:09 Deucher, Alexander <alexander.deuc...@amd.com <mailto:alexander.deuc...@amd.com>> wrote:

    *From:*amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org
    <mailto:amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org>] *On Behalf Of
    *Christian König
    *Sent:* Wednesday, June 14, 2017 12:37 PM
    *To:* Alexandre Demers; Freedesktop - AMD-gfx
    *Subject:* Re: Question about porting VCE1 to amdgpu

        - Would we need a different firmware version with a different
        "hdr" for the amdgpu driver?

    Yes, we should probably release the latest one instead of reusing
    the one used with radeon.

    Actually, we should probably stick the same one as radeon for now
    until we can verify the new firmware in general.  Easier to start
    with a known working case.

OK. Then, is it expected to have a validation failure with the current firmware? Is the header compatible with how the validation is done under VCE2 and others or should I keep how it was done under radeon?


    BTW: Does VCE work on CIK? Alex, don't we run into the same issue
    there as well?

    VCE works on CIK.  We ported VCE and UVD to CIK as part of the
    initial amdgpu bring up.

I've been using VCE2 port as my template for VCE1. My initial intention was to work on UVD, but I ended up plugging in VCE in the first place. UVD is on my todo list right next, I was expecting to working on it after fixing the VCE part.

    Alex



    - Wouldn't it be better to continue loading the driver while
    having VCE disabled IF we fail when loading or validating the FW?
    Completely failing to load the driver for this reason seems
    overkill IMO, since nothing has been loaded in memory and no
    registry have been modified up to that point.

    UVD and VCE are actually needed for correct power management. When
    the blocks fail to initialize you usually sooner or later run into
    problems with power management (e.g. stuck inside a certain power
    level).

OK, but right now it is disabled, so the situation wouldn't be worst isn't it?


    - Would it be a good idea to send a patch as a RFC so some of you
    could help me finish the job and maybe pinpoint where the last
    modifications need to be done?

    Well you could, but to be honest without AMD releasing new
    firmware that is most likely a futile effort.


I'll send a patch then, and we'll navigate from there. This will allow me to work on UVD in parallel.

Alexandre Demers


    Regards,
    Christian.

    Am 14.06.2017 um 18:22 schrieb Alexandre Demers:

        Hi,

        I've been working on porting VCE1 from radeon to amdgpu in the
        last few weeks. I'm pretty much done and I've enabled the
        functionality to see how it goes. However, I ended up with an
        error on the firmware validation (size doesn't seem to fit),
        thus failing completely in loading the driver. I'm testing on
        a R9 280X (Tahiti).

        Three questions then:

        - Would we need a different firmware version with a different
        "hdr" for the amdgpu driver?

        - Wouldn't it be better to continue loading the driver while
        having VCE disabled IF we fail when loading or validating the
        FW? Completely failing to load the driver for this reason
        seems overkill IMO, since nothing has been loaded in memory
        and no registry have been modified up to that point.

        - Would it be a good idea to send a patch as a RFC so some of
        you could help me finish the job and maybe pinpoint where the
        last modifications need to be done?

        Thank you!

        Alexandre Demers




        _______________________________________________

        amd-gfx mailing list

        amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
        <mailto:amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>

        https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx


_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to