On 27/09/16 04:17 PM, Christian König wrote: > Am 27.09.2016 um 01:13 schrieb Marek Olšák: >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Deucher, Alexander >> <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> wrote: >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Marek Olšák [mailto:mar...@gmail.com] >>>> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 4:39 PM >>>> To: Huang, Ray >>>> Cc: amd-gfx mailing list; Deucher, Alexander; Wang, Ken; Huan, Alvin >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] drm/amdgpu: implement raster configuration >>>> >>>> The series is missing a DRM version bump, so Mesa can't really use it >>>> even if it wanted. >>>> >>> We bumped it already this cycle for several other things, but I can >>> add a specific bump for this as well if that is preferred. >> Oh, that's not necessary. One bump per cycle is OK. > > As I wrote in the other thread as well, bumping once per cycle sucks > when you want to bisect something. > > We are also not short on numbers, so I suggest that we establish that we > always bump when we add a new interface to the kernel IOCTL.
Seconded. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
