Dear Luis: Are you still interested in reviewing unified-props? If so, can you please let Jan and me know as soon as possible? The draft needs an in-depth WGLC review by Oct. 9.
All: Since my posting asking for volunteers to review unified-props [1], I have received no offers. Considering that we have performance-metrics draft and the path-vector draft that need to be reviewed for WGLC, the lack of review volunteers do not bode well. One logical conclusion that can be drawn if we do not get any review offers is that the WG does not have the energy to finish existing work. This begs the question on why recharter ALTO if we cannot meet the current deadlines. A subset of you are organizing weekly meetings to further the work on drafts and re-chartering. My advice would be that effort spent on those meetings should be redirected (or at least shared) with reviewing existing drafts so we can finish up the work and get ready for re-chartering. [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/cWi2YNk6odQ_hL-0oF9GRxKyYqs/ Cheers, - vijay
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
