On 04/19/2015 08:43 PM, Wendy Roome wrote:
I believe Section 10.3, page 39 (third paragraph) says version tags must
be 1-64 non-blank ascii characters.
I think that would be a reasonable restriction for cost-type-names as well.
If the both of you think that the above is a reasonable restriction for
cost-type-names, we can file an errata with the RFC Editor.
You can file errata by following FAQ item number 6 in [1].
Just as an FYI, when erratas are filed, they will be sent for vetting to
the Area Directors, WG chairs, and the WG mailing list. Once it has
been determined that this is a genuine errata, the RFC Editor will
update the RFC masthead with the errata.
[1] http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcfaq.html
Cheers,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected]
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
