Hi Sebastian,

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Sebastian Kiesel <[email protected]>wrote:

> Qiushi,
> Richard,
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 09:44:56AM -0400, Y. Richard Yang wrote:
> > > Section 1.2.2
> > >
> > > It's not obvious that the measurement overhead can be reduced by
> > > conducting only fine-tuning or fault-tolerant measurement. It's better
> to
> > > list the parts of the overhead which can be removed.
> >
> > To avoid the details and the complexity that follows, we can remove the
> > word fine-tuning and say only that the application can use ALTO info
> about
> > latency and bandwidth, if provided, and hence no need to measure the
> > latency or bandwidth itself. How does this sound?
>
> I think the word fine-tuning shouldn't be removed completely. But maybe
> we need some fine-tuning of that paragraph :-)
>
> The motivation for this paragraph was to say that, in the P2P scenario,
> if you really want to know throughput values you will have to measure
> them yourself (in the overlay). ALTO can give some predictions who could
> be good other peers and who not, but there are may reasons why ALTO may
> not be accurate (see sec. 8.2.3. of draft-ietf-alto-deployments-06).
>
> One of the main benefits of ALTO is that if I join a new swarm, ALTO may
> give me some promising ("better-than-random") peers to start
> communicationg with, but then I should do some fine-tuning of my peer
> lists based on own measurements.  So the saving of overhead is probably
> not saving traffic for probe messages (many measurements are done on the
> regular application traffic anyway) but it is faster convergence to a
> good state.
>
>
Good discussion. Please see below for the revised text:

        An application that uses an ALTO Service can benefit from
        better knowledge of the network to avoid network
        bottlenecks. For example, an overlay application can use
        information provided by the ALTO Service to avoid selecting
        peers connected via high-delay links (e.g., some
        intercontinental links).  Instead of using third-party
        databases such as geo-location databases, the application can
        use ALTO as a standard to obtain related information. Using
        ALTO to start each node with promising
        ("better-than-expected") peers, an adaptive peer-to-peer
        overlay may achieve faster, better convergence.

Does it address all comments?

Thanks!

Richard


>
> Just my 2 cents
> Sebastian
>
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to