<As individual> On 11/13/2011 07:31 PM, Richard Alimi wrote:
One way forward is to split out Section 8 (redistribution) of draft-ietf-alto-protocol into a separate document as an extension, and only the extension would be blocked on the JOSE WG. Given that this part was not implemented by anyone at the interop event (to my knowledge -- please correct me if I'm wrong) event and there is more
Indeed, the test case document did not include any cases to test for redistribution, and none of the participating server implementations mentioned this as a supported feature.
than enough in the base protocol to get this working for the large majority of use cases.
I think this is a reasonable path (again, speaking as an individual, since I have not talked to Enrico about this yet as a co-chair). I note that there is a now-expired draft on ALTO information re- distribution [1]. This draft is mentioned in the alto-protocol document (see second paragraph of S6.1.2). What is the relationship of [1] to Section 8 of the alto-protocol document? [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gu-alto-redistribution-03 Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA) Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected] Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
