On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 14:50:22 +0800 "littertiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 08:27:11 +0200 > >Axel Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> littertiger wrote: > >> > >> > I'm working on kernel 2.6.9, with alsa 1.0.4 . > >> > do I need to upgrade it to 1.0.12? any main differences? > >> > do I have to download the according version of alsa-lib? > >> > >> What is your need to upgrade? > >> Never touch a running system - it proofs on a daily basis. > >> > >> Ax > >> > > > >I agree - I myself once had a "negative" upgrade - was it > >Mandriva/Mandrake 10.0 -> 10.1 ? > > > >A heavy LADSPA application using JACK + ALSA started producing > >unusable choppy sound. > > > >If you really wish to try, find first a LiveCD with the necessary > >kernel and ALSA versions, try them and if they are OK, only then > >upgrade. > > > >--Sergei. > > I'm building an embedded system. I decide to use 2.6.9 kernel with 1.0.4 alsa. > but alsa 1.0.4 may don't surport dmix for oss emulation. > perhaps some 3rd party applications need oss. so, surporting oss of multi > audio stream will be better. > > REGARDS > littertiger > > > OK, this is somewhat different. But, still, assuming that ALSA C/C++ code is (CPU platform) - independent it still makes sense to try LiveCD if you can connect the sound device you are going to use in your embedded application to a PC. -- Visit my http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ open source project. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
