This is about a change to the alpine package in the Fedora Linux distro. | From: Carlos E. R. <robin.lis...@telefonica.net> | | Ah, then it is that the distribution changed criteria. First they published | with the patch, then without. | | Maybe D. Hugh can report a bug.
The Fedora package switched their upstream. See <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187297> It used to be <http://alpine.x10host.com/alpine/patches/alpine-%{version}/alpine-%{version}.tar.xz> but that disappeared so they switched to <https://alpineapp.email/alpine/release/src/alpine-2.26.tar.xz> The former one contained Eduardo Chappa's patches and the new one does not. If they use <https://alpineapp.email/alpine/patches/alpine-2.25/alpine-2.25.tar.xz> They would get a patched version. Which should be used? Is there a reason not to use the patched version? - the patched version is 2.25 whereas the unpatched version is 2.26 + the source is the same repo and thus likely as trustworthy _______________________________________________ Alpine-info mailing list Alpine-info@u.washington.edu http://mailman12.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/alpine-info