I'm not sure I understand your case. However, I stated that there are
cases where it is worse than O(N^2). The runtime is highly dependent
on the contents of the matrix. In many cases it takes fewer than N^2
iterations. Occasionally it takes more. On average it seems to be
roughly O(N^2), but again that depends a lot on what is in the matrix.
I got that result by trying different ways of filling the matrix. I
tried things like randomly setting each pixel with various
probabilities, placing random horizontal and vertical segments,
placing random squares, or placing random filled squares. I did all of
those both in black on white and white on black. In all of those
cases, going from n=1000 to n=2000 resulted in a runtime increase of
less than a factor of 4.

Don

On Jan 23, 10:33 pm, bharat b <[email protected]> wrote:
> @Don: the solution is very nice.. But, how can u prove that it is O(n^2)..
> for me it seems to be O(n^3) ..
>
> Ex: nxn matrix .. all 1s from (n/2,0) to (n/2,n/2).
> all 1s from (n/2,0) to (n,0).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Don <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The downside is that it uses a bunch of extra space.
> > The upside is that it is pretty fast. It only does the time-consuming
> > task of scanning the matrix for contiguous pixels once, it only
> > searches for squares larger than what it has already found, and it
> > doesn't look in places where such squares could not be. In practice it
> > performs at O(n^2) or better for most inputs I tried. But if you are
> > devious you can come up with an input which takes longer.
> > Don
>
> > On Jan 17, 10:14 am, marti <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > awesome solution Don . Thanks.
>
> > > On Thursday, January 17, 2013 12:38:35 AM UTC+5:30, marti wrote:
>
> > > > Imagine there is a square matrix with n x n cells. Each cell is either
> > > > filled with a black pixel or a white pixel. Design an algorithm to
> > find the
> > > > maximum subsquare such that all four borders are filled with black
> > pixels;
> > > > optimize the algorithm as much as possible
>
> > --

-- 


Reply via email to