@Don- Yes, I agree the choice of Random number generator algorithm should
very much depend on the underlying application.
Thanks, for bringing up the "Diehard" tests, those are some interesting
statistical tests. +1

On 26 October 2012 21:23, Don <[email protected]> wrote:

> How you chose from the wide array of pseudo-random generators
> available depends a lot on how you intend to use it. If you just need
> something that seems random in a video game, a LCG is probably fine.
> However, you could fill a large bookshelf with studies which were
> invalidated because they used randu for simulation. If you need good
> statistical properties for Monte Carlo simulation, don't use a LCG.
> Use a 64-bit multiply with carry as a minimum, and preferably use
> Mersenne Twister.
>
> George Marsaglia developed a very comprehensive set of tests of the
> quality of a stream of "random" data. The suite is called "Diehard".
> It measures statistical properties of a sample and determines if it
> varies too much from what would be expected of a truly uniform and
> random sample. Many LCG generators fail badly.
>
> If you are using the generator for simulation you also need to be
> aware of the generator's period. If you exhaust the period, you are re-
> using data, which defeats the purpose of Monte Carlo simulation.
>
> There are hardware devices which claim to produce true random output,
> usually based on some sort of noisy physical process. They are
> generally slower than Mersenne Twister or other deterministic methods.
> However, they tend to have bias or other issues.
>
> If you need to generate an integer in a certain range, don't just use
> mod n. That does not result in a uniform result unless n is divisible
> by the range of the generator. You need to use a rejection method.
>
> Don
>
> On Oct 25, 8:44 am, Saurabh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Take a look at  Linear Congruential
> > Generator<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_congruential_generator>
> > algorithm
> > for generating pseudo random numbers.
> >
> > On 25 October 2012 16:58, bharat b <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > I heard that LINUX uses our past time mouse movement and keys pressed
> at
> > > time and something else to generate a random number.
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Anuj Khandelwal <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >> hey all,
> > >> Any idea to generate random number without using rand() function call
> ?
> > >> Any algorithms for random number generation ?
> >
> > >> --
> > >> Anuj Khandelwal
> > >> Final Year Undergraduate Student
> > >> Department of Computer Engineering
> > >> Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur
> > >> India
> > >> +91-9784678325
> >
> > >>  --
> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > >> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> [email protected].
> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
> >
> > >  --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected].
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to