correct...my fault On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:04 AM, shady <[email protected]> wrote:
> this is not a sequence point rule... there is only one way of evaluation > here......... > correct me if wrong... > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:26 PM, atul anand <[email protected]>wrote: > >> *i = i + i; // *this voilate sequence point rule >> output is compiler dependent. >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Ravi Ranjan <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> @atul >>> >>> so 8 will be the answer or is it not fixed??? >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Algorithm Geeks" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
