585 + (160 + 5)for slowest transactions *999 for the rest of the
instructions!

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Gene <[email protected]> wrote:

> You guys have the right idea except that since it's multiple choice
> you can do this with no math.  With 1000 data items and only 4 stages,
> the bottleneck has to be the slowest pipeline stage with its register
> delay.  So you can answer b in 10 seconds and move on to the next
> question!
>
> On Sep 26, 8:50 pm, Dumanshu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > @bharat:
> > for the second part where u multiplied (160+5) with 999, it should be
> > 160*999 because it is max of (150,120,160,140,5). Correct me if i am
> > wrong.
> >
> > On Sep 26, 4:02 pm, bharatkumar bagana <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > for the first instruction : 150+5+120+5+160+5+140=585 ns
> > > for the rest of the instructions , though pipeline----
> > > max(150,120,160,140)=160
> >
> > > (160+5)*999=164835 ns
> > >  we assume that there will be no extra stalls existed in our system
> > > ---------585 + 164835 =165420 ns =165.4 us...
> > > correct me if I'm wrong .........
> >
> > > On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:25 AM, siva viknesh <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> > > > A 4-stage pipeline has the stage delays as 150, 120, 160 and 140 ns
> > > > (nano seconds)
> > > > respectively. Registers that are used between the stages have a delay
> > > > of 5 ns each. Assuming
> > > > constant clocking rate, the total time taken to process 1000 data
> > > > items on this pipeline will
> > > > approximately be
> > > > a. 120 us (micro seconds)
> > > > b. 165 us
> > > > c. 180 us
> > > > d. 175 us
> >
> > > > ...plz give detailed explanation for the ans
> >
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > [email protected].
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
> >
> > > --
> >
> > > **Regards
> > > *BharatKumar Bagana*
> > > **http://www.google.com/profiles/bagana.bharatkumar<
> http://www.google.com/profiles/bagana.bharatkumar>
> > > *
> > > Mobile +91 8056127652*
> > > <[email protected]>- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to