> On Jun 7, 2026, at 6:39 PM, Salad via agora-business > <[email protected]> wrote: > > As I wasn't able to fully convince myself that my protosal was worded > correctly, I have opted for banning the creation of Scheduled Actions on > behalf of another player outright. While this makes the proposal less > surgical, I am not a surgeon. > > I submit the following proposal: > > { > > Title: Don't scribble in my calendar > Coauthors: Galle > Adoption Index: 2.0 > Body: > > [ The author of this proposal assumes that the current ruleset allows players > to leverage Scheduled Actions to bypass the limitation that certain actions > be performed as oneself. This assumption is untested. This proposal aims to > close this loophole by banning the creation of Scheduled Actions on behalf of > another player. ] > > In rule 2716, replace: > > A player CAN pay a fee of N spendies > > With: > > A player CAN, as emself, pay a fee of N spendies > > } > > -- > Salad >
I hate to be nitpicky like this, but I'm pretty sure it should say "acting as emself", not just "as emself" - Galle
