M. Hamm via agora-business [2026-05-13 16:36]: > […] > On proposal 9344, I vote to ENDORSE the Absurdor. > > [It seems to me that, per rule 2127, if the Absurdor has not voted (or > it's indeterminate whether the Absurdor has voted), then the above > resolves to PRESENT, and I need to *change* it if I want to vote > otherwise. Therefore:] > > On proposal 9344, if the Absurdor has not voted, or if it's > indeterminate whether the Absurdor has voted, then I *change* my > earlier vote to vote FOR.
Actually, the way it has worked so far is that the votes are evaluated when the proposal is resolved, so you can endorse someone before they have voted. They way you have put it, the effect is the same, because I had already voted (unless I'm wrong about timezones). -- juan
