On 4/28/26 2:49 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-official wrote:
ais523 wrote:
CFJ: If proposal 9336 is enacted at a time when there are two rules it
could repeal that each contain "Janet" or "ais523" in their body,
neither of them are repealed.
This is CFJ 4147. I assign it to Murphy.
Original CFJ and caller's arguments:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2026-April/055482.html
~qenya
Semi-gratuitous argument: one possible place to draw the line would be
whether or not the order of repeals matters. For example, we can imagine a
proposal that would repeal three rules, but all six possible orderings lead
to the same game state (other than the trivial difference of the order of
repeals in that particular instant).
--
Mischief
Collar, Collector, Executor, Speaker
Hat: steampunk hat
