On 4/22/26 10:11 AM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
...This one I'm a little uncomfortable with, since I know eir long consecutive time holding it (nearly 7 years!) is very important to em, but I acknowledge that taking part in a scam that involves abusing that office puts it on the table in terms of reasonable repercussions. I support, but request you only resolve the intent (on the assumption you will become able to do so) if it will genuinely contribute to a counterscam, instead of being part of a "throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks".
Agreed. If there's no reasonable prospect of that one delaying/stopping the scam, I don't intend to use it (it isn't intended to be punitive).
-- Mischief Collar, Collector, Executor, Speaker Hat: steampunk hat
