On 4/15/26 10:16, juan via agora-business wrote:
> I'm tired of looking for the same precedent over and over for the
> same well-established interpretations. I petition the Webmastor to
> create a section of the website where judges may submit documents with
> doctrine. The section may be called “Doctrine”, and the Webmastor
> may even pass regulations for the process of submitting them, depending
> on Agoran consent.
>
> I'm not sure if this is a matter for the Webmastor or Arbitor.
>
> I'll submit the first bit of doctrine:
>
> {
> THE ROLE OF SUBJECT LINES IN MESSAGE INTERPRETATION
>
> Subject lines are not initially relevant to interpretation of
> messages. This means a message is to be interpreted by covering the
> subject line, and then reading it (CFJ 4103 and CFJ 4104).
>
> If the message, however, references the subject line, it may be taken
> into account. This is because messages can make reference to anything
> that can be reasonably easily determined [link to other doctrine entry],
> and subject lines are trivially determinable (CFJ 4103 and CFJ 4104).
>
> Usages of this doctrine:
>
> * CFJ 4117
> * CFJ 4130
> }We already have https://agoranomic.org/stare_decisis/ (source at [0]), though it's been very poorly publicized. [0] https://github.com/agoraNomic/stare_decisis -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor
