On 2/16/26 9:35 AM, Cosmo via agora-business wrote:
[I voted AGAINST on 9300 because the ADoP no longer MUST specify the offices if there are less than 2 but instead MAY specify them, meaning if there is one eligible office the ADoP can choose to not initiate an election for it]
Curious. I think there could be a distinction between "MAY instead" and "instead MAY" in this case. The proposal uses the former, which I read as saying "in this case, the ADoP is allowed to use this alternative means of satisfying the SHALL" whereas the latter is more what you describe ("in this case, the SHALL is downgraded to an alternate that's only a MAY").
-- Mischief Collar, Collector Hat: sleeping cap
