IDK. Seems like probably a mistake -- ey might have meant to quote Cosmo and say something to the effect of "so do I". But what's the precedent (if any) on speculating on an author's intent? My gut would lead me to gratuitously argue that the intended action needs to be less ambiguous, given that there are several valid voting options.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 8:24 AM ais523 via agora-discussion < [email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2026-01-27 at 10:19 -0300, juan via agora-business wrote: > > Cosmo via agora-business [2026-01-26 16:43]: > > I vote FOR 9284. > > I'm interested in whether this one counts as a vote or not (it can be > interpreted either as an attempt to vote or as an attempt to quote > Cosmo). The lack of a ">" quote mark makes it unclear. > > Do people think this is worth a CFJ (and is there a precedent)? > > -- > ais523 >
